my test system is a physical hardware (hp dv2000 notebook) but it happens since the first boot from upgrade.. I have found the same ticket and it oded me being invalid yet with so many logs... I got to be an issue, though not in the ureadahead it self, but something solvable
2010/3/23 Michael Waltz <[email protected]> > I'm getting the same error "ureadahead-other main process (###) terminated > with status 4", although I think it may be due to it running on ESX. It > appears there is a bug report open for it, 484677, with a lot of replies, > but it's marked as invalid. > > I'm going to try 10.04 on some physical hardware this week and see if it > gives the same errors. > > Micheal > > Fabio T. Leitao wrote: > >> another peculiar change in the boot, it no longer uses sreadahead, >> replaced by ureadahead... >> >> which is just fine by the way, but after I have done a # >> do-release-upgrade -d from 9.10 to 10.04 on a test environment, I have found >> out that the sreadahead was still installed, together with ureadahead, >> making the book impossibly sloooww and full of error in my logs... >> >> might be an easy fix during the upgrade script, and was pretty obvious to >> resolve, mainly because it overshut the plymouth GUI all together, echoing >> in a bizzar purple terminal (in yellow letters) about the ureadahead exit 4 >> ... pretty ugly combination if you ask me, but I think it was all together >> an accident >> >> I should repport in apport as soon as I can recreate the steps... >> >> 2010/3/23 Egbert Jan van den Bussche <[email protected] <mailto: >> [email protected]>> >> >> >> I have not tried any of the alpha or beta releases yet. But now I see >> Micheal's horror story. PLEASE do not assume that a server can >> display ANY >> kind of graphics. All my servers run headles and can only be logged >> in with >> ssh. If really no other way, I have to bring a keyboard/display to the >> rack... >> Again please let the init messages flow over our consoles. >> >> Just my 2$c >> Egbert Jan (NL) >> HCC!Hobbynet admininistrator >> >> >> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> > Van: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> > [mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>] Namens Michael Waltz >> > Verzonden: dinsdag 23 maart 2010 21:57 >> > Aan: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> > Onderwerp: Changes in booting with ubuntu-server 10.04 >> > >> > >> > After trying out the alpha and beta releases of Ubuntu I am >> > finding that >> > the booting method of 10.04 is greatly altered. I understand >> > why there >> > were made, to improve the boot time and make it look nicer, but they >> > seem to contrast with how a server should boot. >> > >> > With a traditional unix-like startup a server administrator >> > expects to >> > see what exactly is booting on the system and if there are >> > any failures >> > or warnings. It seems that this is not the case in 10.04 so >> > far. When I >> > first installed Alpha 3, grub automatically booted to the first OS >> > listing without even listing the menu (I understand you can >> > use ESC to >> > go into the menu) and then plymouth took over displaying a >> > splash screen >> > until the login prompt without showing any boot information. >> > >> > Are there plans for the 10.04 server version to keep with a >> > traditional >> > server start-up? Or is this the default we should expect upon >> > install? >> > I've changed a few things, such as enabling the grub menu with a 5 >> > second timeout, removing plymouth on install, but there are >> > still a few >> > bits that make booting seem odd. The first is that the >> > systems boots by >> > default to tty7, displaying a blank screen like it's expecting X to >> > start up. The second is I'm unable to find a way to have >> > upstart display >> > any information about what init or init.d scripts are running. >> > >> > There are a few bug reports on these items, but they're not >> > necessarily >> > "bugs" it seems since this is how the desktop flavor is >> > suppose to work. >> > >> > With 10.04 server can we expect a traditional server boot or are >> > individual admins going to have to enable these extra bits of >> > verbosity >> > manually? >> > >> > -- >> > Micheal Waltz >> > SMG Unix Infrastructure >> > Qualcomm Inc. >> > Phone: 858-845-6083 >> > Cell: 858-882-7079 >> > >> > -- >> > ubuntu-server mailing list >> > [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server >> > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam >> > >> >> >> -- >> ubuntu-server mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server >> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Fábio Leitão >> ..-. .- -... .. --- .-.. . .. - .- --- ...-.- >> >> > -- > Micheal Waltz > SMG Unix Infrastructure > Qualcomm Inc. > Phone: 858-845-6083 > Cell: 858-882-7079 > -- Fábio Leitão ..-. .- -... .. --- .-.. . .. - .- --- ...-.-
-- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
