On 16.04.2010 00:47, Mathias Gug wrote:

> While the goal is worthwhile the implementation seems to not be the best
> option. Using an alternate configuration file breaks a lot of common knowledge
> to the point that an upstream developer filed a bug [1] with a patch to 
> dovecot
> to provide additional checks specific to Ubuntu.

So, instead of just dropping the feature, why not fix it? I know, I'm 
responsible for this one. Unfortunately, I didn't have lot of time to 
work on this one, but I'll do it today.

Dovecot version in lucid supports .d directory for configuration file, 
so this should be much easier now. Sorry for not doing this earlier, but 
I'll do it today.

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Reply via email to