tor 2010-05-13 klockan 10:21 -0700 skrev Kaushal Shriyan: > 2010/5/13 Andreas Olsson <[email protected]>: > > tor 2010-05-13 klockan 10:01 -0700 skrev Kaushal Shriyan: > >> Any clue about the device label being shown "none" as below on Ubuntu > >> 10.04 Server. ? > >> > >> /dev/sda1 xfs 447G 650M 446G 1% / > >> none devtmpfs 36G 216K 36G 1% /dev > >> none tmpfs 36G 0 36G 0% /dev/shm > >> none tmpfs 36G 36K 36G 1% /var/run > >> none tmpfs 36G 0 36G 0% /var/lock > >> none tmpfs 36G 0 36G 0% /lib/init/rw > >> /dev/sda3 ext3 489M 27M 437M 6% /boot > >> > >> Please suggest. > > > > Note the file system type. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tmpfs > > > On a 8.04 Ubuntu Server, its properly labelled > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda1 461G 118G 343G 26% / > varrun 4.0G 72K 4.0G 1% /var/run > varlock 4.0G 0 4.0G 0% /var/lock > udev 4.0G 32K 4.0G 1% /dev > devshm 4.0G 0 4.0G 0% /dev/shm > lrm 4.0G 43M 3.9G 2% > /lib/modules/2.6.24-16-generic/volatile > /dev/sda5 464M 28M 412M 7% /boot > > but on 10.04 Ubuntu Server, it shows as none > > Please explain me the difference
Actually, I am more curious for you to explain the difference to me. As you refer to the 8.04 names to being the proper ones you must have some basis for thinking that? Myself I don't see why the "device name" would matter for a tmpfs. // Andreas
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
-- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
