On 1 July 2010 05:10, Tim Gardner <[email protected]> wrote: > I still find 'better task accounting' to be insufficient justification. > What specifically makes for better task accounting? Why is atop better > then other methods? As far as I can tell the current patches still > suffer from the deficiencies mentioned by Andrew Morton in > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120716470803492&w=2 > > Gimme an example of a problem that atop will help solve for which no > other method will suffice.
I'm not an atop developer, but I maintain System Activity - the KDE GUI "task manager". For network usage: * The internet is slow but you don't know what program is downloading/uploading. You run atop and see that the ftp server is uploading at 1MB/s. I'm not sure what the hard disk counter is all about - I thought that info was already available.. John -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
