On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Serge E. Hallyn <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Douglas Stanley ([email protected]): >> True, it is manual, but it's a bridge. I can't seem to find it now, >> but that's precisely how it was supposed to be configured, according >> to the documentation I was going by (I think it was one of the KVM >> oriented guides). And, no, it's not showing up when I do a brctl show >> on this one server (it shows up fine on the other *identical* server). > > How does it show up? 'ifconfig -a', 'ifconfig', and 'brctl show' output? > The bridge device doesn't show up using any of those commands (not even ifconfig -a). The eth2 device does show up if I do ifconfig -a (as would be expected, as the devices does exist).
I've even tried using eth1 instead of eth2, just to see if it is a physical problem with the eth2 device, but I get the same result. > Mind you think I've had this happen to me before, and as someone mentioned > earlier I ended up having to apt-get remove network-manager. Oh, maybe > what I actually did was to add 'ifdown eth0; ifdown br0' or something > like that to /etc/init/network-interface.conf. It was a few months ago, > and I just needed to get it working... Just to be clear, I installed ubuntu server amd64, so network-manager isn't installed, and never was. I'd also very much like to avoid doing something hackish on this one machine just to get it to work. I have 4 machines that are physically identical (4 nodes inside a single supermicro 2x2 chassis). I'd hate to have to configure one of them different. It just makes no sense. > > -serge > -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
