On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Christophe Sauthier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Scott Moser <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Mathias Gug wrote: > >> Seems like the best option. > > That spec would not be the correct place, as > > a.) it is discussing improvements to the images themselves > > b.) none of the packages Eric mentioned would be in main (uec images only > > contain stuff in main). > > I am sorry Scott, but I am not sure that a package need to be in main > to be discused at a UDS. I can remember some cases (not in the server > part it is true) where it was discussed while the software were in > universe.
Sorry if I was unclear. It is absolutely not a requirement for a package to be in main for it to be discussed at UDS. The requirement is that all packages included in a UEC Image (and, I believe other official distribution media) must be in main. Because of that, the proposed new packages have nothing to do with uec-images. We can (and will) absolutely discuss packaging new upstream sources. Its just that the discussion is not relavant to the uds session that Clint mentioned. -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
