On 01/15/2011 08:56 PM, James Gray wrote: > On 16/01/2011, at 9:12 AM, Monte Milanuk wrote: >>> Works for me. I can understand why they wouldn't advertise the non-LTS >>> versions up front as server installations generally are designed to last a >>> lot longer than your average desktop, and as a result require longer term >>> support. Lastly, I'd hope anyone looking specifically for a "server" >>> version has experience beyond a desktop user and shouldn't have too much >>> difficulty locating the non-LTS download ;) >>> >> >> >> Really? Find it on this page, then. >> >> http://www.ubuntu.com/server >> >> Never said I had trouble finding the download. > > Didn't say you had problems finding the download. I was simply highlighting: > > 1. Possible reasons WHY they only mention the LTS versions > 2. If you're after a non-LTS version, provided you have an IQ higher than a > potted plant, you can't really miss it. :) > > Cheers, > > James > No need to get nasty. It is not listed on the ubuntu.com/server page and that is an error. I've entered bug #703372 [1] against it. Thanks for the heads up.
JP [1]https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content/+bug/703372 -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
