On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 14:00 -0800, Mark Foster wrote: > On 01/25/2011 11:48 AM, Oliver Brakmann wrote: > > I'd like to ask for your opinion whether it would be worthwhile to file > > a bug on this. On the one hand, this is fixed upstream already, on the > > other hand, both puppet and kvm are in main, and Lucid might benefit > > from an SRU. Is this SRU worthy? >
Yes it is, please do! > +1 since per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates it qualifies > for both of these criteria in my opinion. > # Bugs which do not fit under above categories, but (1) have an > obviously safe patch and (2) affect an application rather than critical > infrastructure packages (like X.org or the kernel). > # For Long Term Support releases we regularly want to enable new > hardware. Such changes are appropriate provided that we can ensure to > not affect upgrades on existing hardware. For example, modaliases of > newly introduced drivers must not overlap with previously shipped drivers. > > However it would also be necessary & wise to review the full change log > entries since there is likely way more changed in 1.5.8 (vs. 1.5.6 or 7) > than this one value change. Right, I'd suggest that we just cherry pick the patch, as long as it isn't too invasive. -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
