On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Andres Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > During the Natty release cycle, PowerNap was improved in two main aspects: > - Monitoring enhancements, adding the capability to monitor different > components such as Input, Network Activity and Application activity to > correctly determine the idled state of the machine. > - New Power Saving method, consisting on using pm-powersave and providing a > few additional scripts. > However, now. I'd like to see a Client/Server implementation approach of > PowerNap on which things occur as follows: > - Client auto-registration to a PowerNap server > - PowerNap server tracking the status of a PowerNap client in the network. > - PowerNap server being able to schedule wakeups-sleeps for any of the > clients. > - PowerNap server being able to monitor network to auto wakeup monitored > machines (i.e. ARP Monitor) > - API like base implementation to be able to integrate it to > other applications, (i.e. Landscape.)
These are good, Andres. Additionally, I would like to see the current PowerNap monitors which are still polling to be moved to an event-based model, where possible. -- :-Dustin Dustin Kirkland Ubuntu Core Developer -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
