Oops, chuck is out this week. Adding the whole ubuntu-server list. Thanks for collecting all that info, Boris.
-serge Quoting Boris Derzhavets ([email protected]): > I have tested Chuck's source and rebuilt it one more time. > Nothing is there . I mean patches for HVM support. > > Boris. > > --- On Tue, 7/19/11, Serge E. Hallyn <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Serge E. Hallyn <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Xen 4.1 doesn't support HVM domUs > To: "Boris Derzhavets" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Serge Hallyn" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, July 19, 2011, 7:54 AM > > Quoting Boris Derzhavets ([email protected]): > > Serge, > > > > I have enough info captured on the Net, having actually same content as > > bug :- > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen/+bug/811951 > > > > Yours choice of 4.1 Hypervisor appears to be , unfortunately, very bad > > luck. If you don't like spice , it's up to you. > > But Xen Host not supporting HVM domUs , having broken VFB ( for PV > > DomuS) that's really bad. > > Believe me, F16 will have either 4.2 stable or 4.1 properly patched. > > 4.2 Unstable supports HVM. > > The question is : which set of CS's is responsible for this fix to be > > placed in debian/patches. > > It may be Chuck (cc:d) or else he'd know. > > > Sorry, to write you that, you didn't track Xen development during > > several years. Finally, Windows 7.5 might be assembled > > and named Ubuntu Oneiric. > > thanks, > -serge -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
