On 11/18/2011 10:49 AM, Peter Matulis wrote: > On 11-11-18 10:38 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On 11/18/2011 10:19 AM, Peter Matulis wrote: >>> Secondly, and I vaguely remember a discussion about this on a mailing >>> list, I'm not sure we should be including Eucalyptus docs in the Guide >>> anymore as Openstack is quickly becoming the dominant force for the >>> cloud on Ubuntu. People can obviously continue to use the older release >>> Server Guides. Comments? >> >> The thing that I think is important is to document the upgrade path for >> 10.04 -> 12.04 UEC users from an Ubuntu specific UEC configuration to an >> upstream (consult the upstream docs) Eucalyptus configuration. That may >> be as simple as explaining UEC is dead so just know when you upgrade >> it'll work but it's no longer called UEC or something more complex. > > I don't feel the Guide is the place to document upgrade paths & issues. > Isn't that something that is traditionally reserved for Release Notes? > Also, is it natural for us to expect people to read the new Guide > before upgrading? Just my thoughts.
I think this is a bit of a special case since the product in question went away in the mean time. If they do look ahead in the server guide then having it just vanish as a topic doesn't seem right. There should be something in the release notes too. Scott K -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
