-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 16.02.2012 09:55, Walter Heck wrote: > I think it would be fair to take into account both the things > Colin and Stewart have said as many of them are correct, but their > words should also be taken with a grain of salt as they work for > the companies that would benefit heavily from having 'their' fork > be the replacement of mysql. That's not to accuse them of anything, > just to keep in mind when making a decision. The fork that 'wins' > this decision might well be the more succesful one in the long run > simply because of being the default mysql version in two of the > most widely used linux distributions.
well spoken. At some point I also guess that "our" descission may even influence the other two major's: SuSE and DeadRed? B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk88xZAACgkQABMWRpwdNul//QCg0Iw4xdpLMed97c7EXcyyQYX3 JCsAn2nnEuQybUafR8air58qF84/4D34 =fHwe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
