Quoting Andreas Hasenack ([email protected]): > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Serge Hallyn <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Quoting Andreas Hasenack ([email protected]): > > > Hi, > > > > > > for an experiment I'm trying to deploy 100 containers on a machine. I > > used > > > the "ubuntu" charm and basically did a for loop with juju add-unit ubuntu > > > --to lxc:1 > > > > > > I had to adjust some ulimit limits, but so far, so good. > > > > > > It's taking more time than I expected to deploy this, but what really > > > caught my attention is how long lxc-ls --fancy takes to complete: > > > > > > # time lxc-ls --fancy | grep juju-machine-1|wc -l > > > 91 > > > > > > real 1m36.950s > > > > the --fancy does add a lot of work, but this seems slower than it ought > > to be. Are the containers running while you are doing this? Is it > > faster if they happen to all be stopped or all started? > > > > > They were running, but doing nothing.
Right my thought wasn't that the system was busy due to containers, but rather that if the container is running, then lxc-ls --fancy will attach to every container one-by-one to get some information like ip address. > It was just a deployment of the > "ubuntu" charm. Didn't try with them all stopped, and right now I don't > have that system up anymore. Ok, thanks. If Stéphane doesn't have any ideas offhand then I will try to reproduce this by hand. Thanks for the information. -serge -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
