On Tuesday, January 19 2021, Robie Basak wrote: > LP: #1909950 - *(New) [bind9] - TCP connections never close
I've been meaning to take a look at this one, but I'm trying to juggle my current tasks and I currently have other things happening. > Finally, I'm not sure how to handle this one in terms of priority. > Normally I'd say that if it is valid, it doesn't affect most Ubuntu > users so needs a volunteer to drive it. Should it be treated any > differently just because it's an i386 whitelist request? > > LP: #1904990 - *(Triaged) [sssd] - Missing i386 version of > libnss-sss Not sure, TBH. Based on the discussion Timo said it'd be fine to drop gdm from the list of sssd's B-D, but I'd like to understand it a bit better the possible impact of doing that. -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
