As I stated in a thread about the same topic. If we endorse Qsampler in any way, we are indirectly endorsing linuxsampler (which ironically isn't free... come on l i nu x sampler?).
We should avoid endorsing, even indirectly, any non free software. Not just because we can't ship it by default. But because we would be stepping in our toes in the movement of making multimedia production grow in the free software world. To give an extreme example... maya, with it's closed source license, can run in linux. And let's be honest, it's more vastly used in the 3d profesional world. Are we going to bundle it in a tricky way for ubuntu studio and ditch blender. Hell no! We want to see blender grow to it's full potential, which is a huge. Luis de Bethencourt On Nov 26, 2007 9:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be a good idea to remove Qsampler, if it is not possible to > ship linuxsampler... > > Toine > > > > Cory K. a écrit : > > > Since there are several samplers out there and Qsampler depends on > > linuxsampler (which we cannot ship) Qsampler is kinda on the chopping > > block in Ubuntu. > > > > What are some thoughts on this? > > > > -Cory \m/ > > > > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel > -- Luis de Bethencourt Guimerá luisbg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: B0ED1326 -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
