Eric Hedekar wrote: > I know this would be much more intense to setup than just a > meta-package, but it might be a thought to look into setting up a > second partition or install that's configured as a production LAMP. > Maybe this is also possible to do with just a single > partition/install, but I would be careful about security (can apache > be configured to just respond to local requests?). This would allow > much more web development in server-side scripting etc... > > As for suggestions for the Metapackage (if there's time to build one): > cssed - graphical CSS editor > gphpedit - development environment for PHP/HTML/CSS > kompozer - Complete Web Authoring System > gftp - X/GTK+ FTP client > agave - colorscheme designer for the GNOME desktop (i know the > ubuntustudio-graphic already includes this, but it's quite useful for > web design too) > drivel - Blogging client for the GNOME desktop (maybe not, but it's > lightweight enough) > Would it be possible to include flash/java/etc... support? I kind of > know the answer already, but I feel these are somewhat important for a > web development suite so the issue shouldn't be ignored. > > If the op could suggest what troubles they've had configuring their > development environment, then more could be done to help.
Gmail users: Please *DO NOT* top post. I'm unsure about this really. It feels like a corner-case and would be a very small user group. I am unsure if it's worth the trouble. I'll say this though. If anyone starts a topic on the forums or Brainstom idea and it gets alot of support (hundreds of votes) I'll be on board to support a metapackage of apps only. We have a small team and implementing else will really requite someone else to come on (without *any* hand-holding) to get it done. That's my 2 cents. Luis (now the Studio lead) might have other ideas. -Cory K. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
