I forgot to mention I used the -lowlatency in both cases. On 10/07/2010 11:36 PM, Ronan Jouchet wrote: > Hi, > > Today I did some ISO testing and here are the results: > > - Studio installed from ubuntustudio-alternate iso works fine. > > - Studio "installed" from ubuntu-desktop iso + ubuntustudio-audio > metapackage is a disaster. Mountains of xruns even when doubling the > latencies reached with no xruns on a studio install. While this has > always led to a non-optimal result, it used to work and was good enough > for many (like ttoine and I), with the advantage to stay close from a > standard ubuntu install. > Note: I did the usual setup in groups and limits.conf. > > Did I miss something or did something really change a lot between 10.04 > and 10.10, making ubuntu+ubustu-metapackages a non-option? > I like Ubuntu's package selection! I like the new font and desktop > polish! I like having a standard install! I like network-manager even if > it means losing 1ms latency! > > Thanks for your help :) > > -- ronj - http://ronj.bandcamp.com
-- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
