Puredata workflow updated. feedback is appreciated :D 2010/11/1 David Henningsson <[email protected]>
> On 2010-10-31 19:36, Scott Lavender wrote: > > > > > > @David Henningsson > > > > We should keep audacity. You might be able to use ardour for > mastering > > as well, but IIRC ardour is trickier to set up (jack etc) whereas > > audacity can run on anything. And, as pointed out by another user, it > > seems to be needed in a workflow already. > > > > > > I may have a differing view on this. > > > > What purpose will Audacity serve? > > > > If one is using Audacity to record music without JACK, then perhaps > > downloading 1.7 gigs and installing Ubuntu Studio is overkill and not > > our target audience. I would suggest this audience is better served > > by using vanilla Ubuntu and installing Audacity manually. > > > > By contrast, I would expect the typical Ubuntu Studio user to use JACK > > and Ardour for audio. This is just my opinion mind you. > > > > I had actually put Audacity in the workflows, but under the Graphics > > section, which would be installed when the user selects the "[ ] > > Graphics" box during installation. This would be used to make simple > > edits to audio to be used with creating videos. > > > > But if you have a desired place for Audacity in the audio toolchain, > > please add it to the wiki :) > > > > ScottL > Okay, I have added Audacity to the list of workflows. However, if you > feel like that workflow is not a typical "ubuntu studio user" workflow, > feel free to remove it. I admit to not having followed the "who are we > targetting" discussion closely. > > // David > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel > -- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
-- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
