2011/3/25 ailo <[email protected]> > I've been doing some testing on previous kernels together with a few > people, and the sum of my experience is, just use jack with a program > you like, try using the lowest latency you can. > I don't count xruns that come from starting or stopping programs. But I > do look for any or even one xrun at a certain ms setting. > Just writing on the list and telling shortly of the results is helpful. > Like, what was the lowest ms setting, maybe adding a part of the jack > message showing what settings were used. > > However, if we are to test the 2.6.39 for irq priority, I don't know > what we need. Do we need a rtirq script, or will the irq priorities be > set by just using realtime prio? > For the tests, it would be greate to have people who usually get > problems from irq sharing. > > On 03/24/2011 11:08 PM, Timothy Cook wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Alessio Igor Bogani <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> > >> So I could provide a -lowlatency kernel based on 39 kernel if enough > >> testers will offer theirs help. Sincerely I would want avoid to waste > >> time for make something that no one will use. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> > > I for one, would enjoy having this. > > I am currently using Natty with an Alesis io2 Express USB device. > > > > I am still not certain what are valid tests for this setup. Should I > report > > xruns over a period of time,etc? > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > If your real time kernel provide it already, perhaps it would be better to kee focus on a good real time kernel, than spending too much time on an other kernel ?
Toine
-- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
