Dear Ralf, 2011/4/6 Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]>: [...] > Note that today we should prefer the tickless timer. [...] > The 1000 Hz timer still isn't obsolet, because HPET/HR timer sometimes [...]
How have you tested? What results have you obtained? If you want convince someone else you should provide testing procedures and numeric results. [...] > What is my point? > > RT on Linux isn't 'hard RT', so de facto even the RT patch isn't a real > RT patch. I think that no one here is interested to determine how much the PREEMPT_RT patch is "hard" or "soft". We are working on a kernel that better fits our users needs. In any case the -rt/-realtime kernel maintainer role is vacant. Are you interested? Ciao, Alessio -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
