I believe Audacity to be the most widely used audio editor among open
source alternatives. It is commonly used on Mac and Windows as well.
I see it more or less as an industry standard. It's like Gimp among
audio editors.
It should definitely be kept in my opinion.
On 08/15/2011 08:36 PM, Filipe Lopes wrote:
hey Scott, what audio editor is used in place of audacity?
afaik, audacity is full featured and works nice (my favorite [linux] audio
editor).
I know some people that use it on Windows, so they already how it works.
I think the question should be - why isn't audacity included?
2011/8/15 Scott Lavender<[email protected]>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:50 AM, David Henningsson<
[email protected]> wrote:
Hmm, seeds and that is not my area of expertise, but I seem to be missing
audacity?
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
http://launchpad.net/~diwic
--
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.**ubuntu.com<[email protected]>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/**
mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-**studio-devel<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel>
David,
Audacity was consciously removed from the seeds.
I would infer that you believe it should included. May I ask why so?
Cheers,
ScottL
--
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
--
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
