On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 21:03 +0800, C. F. Howlett wrote: > A little insight into the whole photo processing theme > > Linux Tools for Serious Photographers
Interesting. I'm missing apps to scan photographic negatives, slides and photos on paper. Dunno if this is possible with getting good quality results, since all I've seen caused a bad quality. I suspect more old photographers still need to handle those, but just a few perhaps do cartography photos with digi cams. Btw. I'm not a photographer, but I learned all kinds of arts and had to learn photography too. I still own a 35mm camera and never bought a digi cam. I can't pay professional photo laboratories, my photo laboratory mouldered in cartons and there are no "averaged" payable photo laboratories today that do a good job, at least I don't know them. My former girlfriend is also not a photographer, but during her studying she also had to learn it. She did use 35mm to shoot photos for large posters, no medium format camera or larger format was needed. I suspect that we got a quality loss for photography too. At least for audio I'm missing my old analog equipment, but for audio digital stuff is less expensive, while for photography it seems to be the other way round. Am I mistaken, regarding to a lack of knowledge? Is good quality digital photography payable? Regards, Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
