On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 12:40 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > What would a live user require from a video player? > > - It should be able to play as many formats as possible, naturally. > - streaming over network? > - what else? > > I don't use video players myself much for else than playing simple video > files, so I'm not an expert on this subject. > > We would have use for people overlooking our different workflows, and > see if we are fulfilling as many needs for those workflows as possible > with our default applications. > > - audio > - graphics > - video > - photography > - publishing > > I suppose we should also include this as a workflow, as it's a generic > one that all users have use for, but doesn't necessarily fall withing > the other ones. > - desktop > > To solve the problem with the video player, perhaps someone would like > to take a deeper look at what we are enabling, as far as "video" and > "desktop" workflows are concerned. Preferably someone who has video as > their main interest, or at least as a strong interest. > We probably need to include two video players. One generic consumer grade player, which would be a part of our "desktop" workflow, and a pro "video" workflow player. If one could be used for both, that would be fine. I still think both metas should depend on a video player that matches the need for that workflow. So, basically, we need two players, even if both end up being the same one.
-- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
