On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 08:15 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 07:59 +0200, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: > > That said I agree it makes good sense to use XSane for the Ubuntu > > Studio workflows if it allows to scan directly to Gimp and other > > applications, and the alternative scanning applications don't have > > that feature. > > IMO it doesn't matter if we need to use an additional application or if > we directly could scan using GIMP or what ever app we're using. Decisive > IMO is the scanning quality to quickness ratio. > > I don't own a scanner myself and visit friends using different Microsoft > and Apple solutions, if I need a scan. Not seldom the fast scans by > amateur equipment and default software are better than slow scans using > professional gear, with professional software. Likely my professional > friends are not aware how to set up their professional hardware and > software correctly ;), but it doesn't matter to me. If I need a scan I > prefer to visit a social pedagogue, than a graphic designer. The scans > are faster and have a better quality by default. > > IOW what application can be used more intuitive and does provide good > results?
PS: The graphic designers aren't idiots, they need to scan monochrome outlines only, while the social pedagogues scan coloured photo albums, magazines etc.. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
