In regard to the names why not stick with kubuntu lubunutu xubuntu etc for the names? and ubuntu can be going or unity?
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Kaj Ailomaa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014, at 03:53 PM, Len Ovens wrote: > > On Sun, 18 May 2014, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > > > I would suggest we name the metas and the desktop sessions: > > > > > > ubuntustudio-gnome > > > ubuntustudio-kde > > > ubuntustudio-lxde > > > ubuntustudio-unity > > > ubuntustudio-xfce > > > > Does the one that comes stock need to have it's own name? or should it be > > called -custom? I guess my question is "shouldn't the user be aware which > > DE is considered default and is most customised/tested?" > > > > I think the custom meta should just be called ubuntustudio-desktop, as > now. > > -- > ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel > -- Jonathan Aquilina
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
