On Tue, May 26, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > It would also mean we can fine tune each "workflow"/category, so that we > make sure we really have the best possible tools and utilities for each > area of multimedia production.
If we really want to take this to a next level, we also do a bit of documentation on each sub category, and explain what tools are used for what purpose. We would do this in our web site. One page(meta) for each main category, and one page(meta) for each sub category. Also, a link to install the meta package from that page. There wouldn't need to be much on each page. Just a bit of written info and some pictures. A link to a video on youtube, where the video just quickly shows the tools in action. Also, links to additional resources for the applications, such as the home page, documenation, important community, great tutorials, etc. Additionally, it would be great if we would list packages that were not selected for our metas. Or, at least give an easy way to find them - like we do in the menu with the Extra packages links. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
