On Tue, Jun 2, 2015, at 09:27 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 06/02/2015 07:21 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > > On 06/02/2015 10:41 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > >> Using existing Freedesktop categories is of course no problem, > >> especially if they make a lot of sense for specific packages. > >> We still need to agree on the non-standard categories that we want to > >> use and suggest upstream. > >> > >> Anything more? > > > > No - I think we can crack on with it. We can always put a mark against > > ones we are not sure of, and adjust the wiki page with the list of > > categories (comments or suggested additional categories) as we go along. > > > > Just tried two in the audio section. Here are some tips. > > To find if there is a desktop file, try Debian Code Search: > http://codesearch.debian.net/ > Search for something like "package:rosegarden Categories" > > For ardour3, I found two desktop files, the upstream one and the Debian > one. To work out which one was installed, I browsed the source code: > https://sources.debian.net/ > > Whilst you can get the same/similar information on Launchpad, the search > functions on Debian seem easier to use (to me). >
Thanks. I'm considering getting the existing desktop categories using a script which would checkout each repo and scan for a desktop file, then get the categories from the desktop file and store them. I could remake the wiki tables once I have that sorted. Would simplify the work a lot for us. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
