On 2015-06-17 12:42, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > Set had the same proposal, but I I have been pushing to follow standards > as closely as possible, and there is no freedesktop category for > "visual". Video is rather a mix between audio and graphics, which does > not make it strictly visual, so I do feel it is correct not lumping it > with graphics all together. The three main categories in how freedesktop > standardizes is: > * Audio > * Graphics > * Video
It sort of work on the orthology[1] level to reduce it to 2 work-flows, but doesn't work well on the computing level. Reducing it to "audio" and "visual" comes with an endless mind-puzzle of what is where and why... Or even one-way questions like: why not throw it all under "multimedia"? :) Having a wider base-taxonomy is a better choice to avoid having software appearing in many different places. TL;DR I've come to reason about those 3 categories making perfect sense. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthology_%28language%29 -- Set Hallstrom -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
