On 09/22/2015 12:48 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: >> The "conflicts" was added very recently: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795444 >> >> I am not sure how the black listing works, but certainly enum & enum34 >> cannot live together. >> >> I suppose python-enum34 has to be kept, as there are quite few reverse >> dependencies. Bit of a shame though. We could always ask Alessio (Debian >> Multimedia Team) who seems to have forked laditools if he believes >> laditools could be made to work with enum34? >> > > Ah, sorry. You already were on top of the problem. > > If anyone wants to try to fix this for the sake of reintroducing ladi to > Ubuntu Studio, be my guest. > Either laditools needs to be able to import python-enum, if both > python-enum and python-enum34 are installed at the same time (and the > conflict can then be removed), or as Ross suggests, laditools needs to > be rewritten to support python-enum34. >
I was going to submit the bugs tonight - after your previous mail we can now say we are on top of it :-) -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
