Thank you Ross! On 2015-12-17 08:13, Ross Gammon wrote: > Done - I don't like to hold up such productive people! See link on > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Testing/Testcases > > I only created one bug as I assume they are part of the same source > package. Confirming this is difficult when searching online reveals a > lot of broken links :-) > > Let me know if it is not right to lump the two tests together in one > test case. > They both have different GUI and menu entries, but one test-case is probably enough, given it includes both :)
> Regards, > > Ross > PS: There is a link near the top of that page to report missing test > cases. You can always look at a previous bug to copy the style. Great!! :) > On 2015-12-17 04:35, WMID wrote: >> Good idea to make a manual, I hope to see I was also confused by the name at first; manual test-cases. Was it about writing manuals? Was it about testing the software? Shows up this is about creating a "manual" on how test the programs, so many other people can try the same things manually in a program, instead of a robot testing it automatically, and together make sure the software works as expected. Everything we write here ends-up like this: http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/350/builds/105268/testcases/1600/results However, send your question regarding phatch to the user-list, and i will help you get familiar with it :) It's easier to write a manual from questions. :) Yours, -- Set Sakrecoer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
