On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, set <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do we have a trace of the written permission from canonical to use the > brand? If so, does it need to be renewed? > > Not that I know of or have seen. Ttoine would probably have the best knowledge as he was dabbling with all the permissions when setting up the merchandise part.
> The kopimist in me, through my own stupefaction over how cumbersome and > silly the necessity of licenses STILL is, can relate lukefromdc's > worries. "Protect something from being protected"...? Copyright is a > strange recursive loop i want to end. Yet, because i want to end that > loop, I have no interest in ownership of my contribution to > ubuntu-studio, meaning; if canonical would, for whatever reason chose a > direction that would render ubuntu-studio unuseable for me, i would give > my thanks for the experience acquired and focus my output elsewhere. > > As with all volunteering work. Either you stick with it and argue your case to bring the solution towards your end, or you leave to focus your energy elsewhere. I think that was part of the email discussions we had earlier concerning what up- and downsides there are to be a part of the Ubuntu official distributions compared to creating a separate Studio project. /Jimmy
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
