On 17 February 2016 09:34:32 +01:00, Kaj Ailomaa <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:58 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:54 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > > > > > I already sent an email to the guy, but realized we have other concerns > > > too. For 14.04, the wallpaper was not just a wallpaper. It was a theme > > > used for all our social channels. If we want to continue to have a > > > generic theme, which we use for everything, I'm not sure a flame will do > > > it. The flame could be a variant of it, but not the "it". > > > > > This is my initial opinion, by the way. If flames were to be used as a > > generic theme, I believe they would need to be stylized somehow. It's > > still a bit weird for a generic theming, I think. > > > > > I got word from lihualiu, the author of the proposed default wallpaper. > Unfortunately he is not interested in further work, but supplied me with > the original project file, which is a photoshop project. The flame is > found on the internet, but I haven't asked from where exactly. So, all > in all, I'm a little reluctant to use this as the default wallpaper > right now. > I agree. Even though there was no expressed rule that it should be created > with FLOSS tools I sure think it's preferred. And not knowing about the > origin of the flame and whether it is ok to use is a big impediment. Good > thing you were in contact! /Jimmy
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
