On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 05:46 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi All, > > Prompted by a comment by Len on IRC (about Audacious), I did a quick > check for obvious packages that might have dropped of our DVD without a > conscious action. > > When producing the Package QA Tracker, I prioritised the Test Cases > based on what was in our menu at the time. > > The only one that seems to have dropped off is Audacious: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta/+bug/1565040 > > And then when checking the bugs for Len's Synaptic bug, I discovered a > bug related to Shotwell: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta/+bug/1189250 > > Is there any reason why I shouldn't add these to to our seeds? I don't > want to randomly add packages without thinking about it first.
I think all DEs have a media player that comes with the DE. So, I don't see why audacious absolutely needs to be included. Is Shotwell intresting for graphics? -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
