On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:14:23 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote: >On 2016-06-14 10:10, Set Hallstrom wrote: >> In fact it made me realize that i didn't ask for anything to >> illustrate the first section of the feature tour, that outlines what >> U-S is more broadly. That would be the place for the logo as placed >> in Geirdal's proposals. It would also be a great place for a >> background that is purely Mandelbrot-based. > >Maybe this section is the place to complete the circle, as suggested by >Ralf?
There's no need to complete the colour circle, but when doing it, the CoF should remain blue, just the rest of the background should be green. Another "circle" would be an opening in blue, followed by category colours and finale category music in blue. To cut the CoF is ok, but since Set fears the impression of deformation, an idea might be to display the complete CoF by the opening graphic and to cut the category icons for the following graphics. We should remember that the speech of graphic not only is related to advertising strategy. There is a culture of this language. Many people don't speak this language, but subliminally they understand much of this language. Some patterns are universally valid for music and graphic, such as an opening and finale. We not necessarily use it this way for art, but for explanations, advertisings etc., it makes sense to include some layman's terms of art language. A lot of art is like vogon poetry. Not musterfully breaking with rules and/or layman's terms, it's just not understandable, because it's senseless arranged language. This is still ok, if a graphic for thewall fits to the colour of the sofa, but becomes an issue, when used as an element of communication. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
