On March 30, 2018 4:12:34 PM GMT+02:00, Set Sakrecoer <pub...@sakrecoer.com> 
wrote:
>On March 30, 2018 12:17:51 PM GMT+02:00, Lord Jonathan Moore
><jdm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I was looking at the replace-qjackctl-a blueprint and think Candace
>>would
>>be better it is faster to use than patchage. And looks more organized
>>with
>>a ladish session. I would like an opinion on ladish vs jack,
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>
>>jdm7dv
>
>Hi Jonathan!
>
>Thanks for reaching out and taking the time to inveatigate the
>question! 
>
>I kindof lost touch with music production at the same time i lost touch
>with ubuntu studio. I'm hoping to get chance to test Cadence. I think i
>remember hearing ladish development was sort of abandoned, but i might
>be very wrong...
>
>The rule of thumb is: if it fits in debian, it fits in UbuStu. This is
>because we pull packages from debian. I hope someone else can fill the
>many blanks. 
>
>TL;DR i am not against it, but i'm not really fit for judging and i
>hope more ppl will get involved in giving you feedback.
>-- 
>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
>-- 
>ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
>ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
>Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel

Ps. Sorry, I mismanipulated my portable email client and by doing so forgot to 
sign the previous email properly. public@sak***oer.com is my alternative 
mailing list email address...

Yours,
--
Set Hallström AKA Sakrecoer

-- 
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel

Reply via email to