I think the interface doesn't matter much, unless it (usb?) uses a lot of cpu...
Of course, USB audio is not as good as firewire. But I think it should be just fine. On Jan 4, 2008 1:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How important exactly is the interface in keeping XRUNs in check? With the > proper configuration on any well endowed machine should I be able to > synthesize without glitches regardless of interface? Also, could someone > point me toward the LUA (?) archive? > > Thanks! > > ~holotone > http://holotone.net > > > On 1/2/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I got myself a ua-25 for christmas and it works well, it's perfect for > > my needs. There are however a few things that could be problematic for > > you: > > it's not USB 2.0 (1.1? No duplex in 96kHz mode) > > it has no exernal power supply (buspowered) > > > > I haven't done many latency related tests yet, many settings work well > > but I also get occasional xruns which may but are more likely not > > related to the interface. > > It has direct monitoring capabilities, so the latency is unimportant in > > certain recording situations. > > > > It uses a quite standard kernel module: snd_usb_audio > > just modprobe it if it doesn't happen automatically anyway. > > I tried it with ubuntu studio, musix, dyne:bolic and > > pure:dyne(problems, probably some settings) so far. > > > > There are a lot of competitors that may suit you better: Alesis io|2, > > tascam 122(without L) and probably some more. Search the lau archive. > > > > Regards > > Philipp > > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users > > -- Christopher Stamper [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg
-- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
