On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Hartmut Noack <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Billy C schrieb: > > >> A more effective color management system would be needed prior to >> making the claim that EVERYTHING needed for graphics was present. > > Yeah - right. But this is linked to licensing-issues, so I would not > blame a Linux-Distro for being imperfect in that... > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkl8+BMACgkQ1Aecwva1SWNuBwCdGadEWcnsHeqg1ArQRT59jtnD > qosAniecyTv6oCndB/EvxIkestvVuLOk > =ZhV5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users >
The pieces are already present, were they packaged for easier installation/included in the distro, that would make the "all-inclusive multimedia package" a more valid claim, as color management is ESSENTIAL to billable hours for graphic arts or photography concerns. As one of the audio users mentioned earlier, some of us would rather spend the time with billable hours projects than tweaking and debugging software. BC -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
