Hi Eric, hi everybody, My two cents about LiVES: - Though not officially in ubuntu, it is currently regularly packaged by the getdeb team (http://www.getdeb.net/app/LiVES). Does it mean it can be easily suggested via REVU? - Note also that it has been maturing quite nicely recently, and seems IMHO one of the most well-maintained apps mentioned here.
I added salsaman (LiVES author) to this discussion. Cheers, Ronan > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:13:18 -0700 > From: Eric Hedekar<[email protected]> > Subject: Addition(s) to the Video Meta package > To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion > <[email protected]>, "Ubuntu Studio > Development& > Technical Discussion" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi Everyone, > > I've seen a number of posts to the forums asking about live video > adjustment software, VJ software and the like. There actually is a large > amount of this available for Linux but none in the Ubuntu Studio video meta > package. Here's a quick list of what I've stumbled upon: > > * FreeJ http://freej.org/ packaged: > http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=freej > * EffecTV http://effectv.sourceforge.net/ packaged: > http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=effectv > * frei0r plugins: http://www.piksel.org/frei0r packaged: > http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=frei0r-plugins (more of a > library than a software package) > * GEM library for Pure Data http://gem.iem.at/ packaged: > http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=gem > * PDvjtools http://artefacte.org/pd/ not packaged (yet) > * VeeJay http://www.veejayhq.net/ not packaged (yet) > * Gephex http://www.gephex.org/ not packaged (yet) > * Lives http://lives.sourceforge.net/ not packaged (yet) > > Personally I think any one of these softwares would make a great addition to > the video meta package, but seeing as I'm not a video junkie I really am not > sure if they'll get used. This e-mail is to judge public interest/support > for such an addition to the meta, and if it's positive, which of the above > (or possibly one I haven't listed) would be best? > Logically, adding one that's already in the repositories would be easiest > for Karmic, but if packaging wasn't a stumbling block I'd prefer to see > VeeJay added (purely based on the look of it's user interface). The > libraries for Pure Data would also be nice additions since Pure Data is > already included in the audio meta. FreeJ also looks good. Thoughts? > > -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
