On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 12:16 +0300, Asmo Koskinen wrote: > 15.09.2010 12:07, Ralf Mardorf kirjoitti: > > > If you've got the time to test it, please run top, atop, htop or what > > ever you prefer and compare the CPU usage when using the GUI. > > > > The old version should be in /usr/bin and because you didn't compile > > with prefix, the new version should be in /usr/local/bin. > > > > If there should be issues, you might want to report it to the list and > > Niels Mayer<nielsma...@gmail.com>. > > I try that later in this week.
Hi Asmo :) I'll do it later in this week too and btw. I guess it's not really important if the CPU usage should be higher than it was for the old Envy24control, because I guess most people, me too, don't use the faders real-time, but just to level before record or play. Resume: You wrote "I tested today Mudita24 - great job!" I believe they did a good job. I'm running an older overworked version were the CPU is stressed much more, but anyway this isn't a problem for me. Sometimes I'm not fine with Linux, but it's really a highlight of Linux, that oldish stuff still is supported :). Because of this and some other reasons I like to have Linux only running on my PC, but I need to run several distros, because I didn't found the distro that gives me all I need. - Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users