Ralf, Can you explain why you think Ardour 3's implementation of MIDI is a little bit bizarre? I.E. do you think there are some features missing or is it hard to use? Please explain... I'm wondering because a lot of people really seem to like it.
-MRH On May 31, 2012 5:09 AM, "Ralf Mardorf" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 08:56 +0200, bart deruyter wrote: > > That means a midi and audio capable DAW. > > > > All of it in Ardour? > > Ardour2 is for audio only and Ardour 3 for audio and MIDI. While Ardour2 > is the best software for audio, Ardour3 for MIDI still has got serious > lacks. I'm an old school MIDI user from the 80's, for MIDI (with less > audio) I recommend to use Qtractor. > > > That's new to me, well, with Ardour 3 yes, but without a printable > > score. The official release isn't out yet... it's still beta. It has > > midi support though. > > Dunno which Linux app is the best to print scores, but Rosegarden is for > audio, MIDI and MIDI score and perhaps one of the most used > "sequencers". > > > Rosegarden does it all, and with a score. But I'm not a fan of it... I > > had too many issues with it, but it might work out well for you. > > +1 > > > My guess is, wait for Ardour 3 to release a stable version, download, > > install (installer is really easy) and try it out. Then you'll have a > > audio/midi recording app of huge quality. > > IMO at the moment the way MIDI is implemented is a little bit bizarre. > > - Ralf > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users >
-- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
