What is the url to download the Athlon 64 bit studio 13.1o please. gonna stick 
it on my gigstick
-- 

 Alex Armani - IT Consultant / Digital Musician 
+447972641526 - MYspace.com/Alex.Armani
 www.facebook.com/Alex.Armani.01.UK



>________________________________
> From: "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Thursday, 5 September 2013, 13:00
>Subject: ubuntu-studio-users Digest, Vol 77, Issue 4
> 
>
>Send ubuntu-studio-users mailing list submissions to
>    [email protected]
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    [email protected]
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>    [email protected]
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-studio-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1.  13.o4 (Gord L Williams)
>   2. Re:  13.o4 (ZP)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:30:03 -0300
>From: Gord L Williams <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [ubuntu-studio-users] 13.o4
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Okay dudes, I have a perfect install of 13.o4 with everything working. Do you 
>want me to try the upgrade, or just wipe it and install clean?
>?--?
>?Alex Armani - IT Consultant / Digital Musician?
>+447972641526?- MYspace.com/Alex.Armani
>?www.newmatrixism.com
>
>Alex,  I use LTS versions only,  which are supported for a longer cycle.  
>https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS   Although they lack the latest software,  as in 
>bleeding edge,  they are stable as they get.  I would suggest 12.04 LTS if you 
>want to rock out for a while. 13.04 and anything non LTS has a shorter support 
>cycle,  and usually when they fix it another version catches the attention of 
>everyone and off they go,  to an extent.
>
>If your purpose is recording like mine is,  you can add the latest Ardour or 
>Mixbus fairly easily to this stable base.   All other software is also subject 
>to update,  as well.  In this way your wanting for little.  Sometimes a 
>software requires the latest version of the libraries (linux programs rely on 
>them and often aren't compiled in the same way windows programs are,  and can 
>be a bit more painful,  Windows programs will update the libraries at install 
>- .net is one of them for instance.)
>
>The point is there is a decision to be made in most cases between bleeding 
>edge and stable.  I opt for stable obviously and upgrade only what I 
>absolutely need.   The alternative is to look for distributions that have done 
>it for you.  Ubuntustudio is one, KXStudio is another and Dreamstudio is 
>probably the most augmented in terms of software. Dreamstudio comes with the 
>latest Ardour,  no need to install it.  But going the route of installing a 
>distribution can be rather uneven in that respect.  Distributions pick the 
>software,  and for instance I have no idea what to do with Cinelerra or if I 
>will do something with it.  Maybe if I do some local stuff on video.  Mostly I 
>am voiceover by remote.  Not my precise purpose, see what I mean?
>
>For digital music,  your probably fine with Ubuntustudio.  Me I am a voice 
>over artist and tend to tear down or erase a lot of the synth stuff as it does 
>not apply.   I do a little photography,  so I keep that.
>
>I suppose I just can't find an ideal distribution without what many call 
>'bloat'.   I tried at one point to go with a plain ubuntu distribution and 
>customize it,  but that got off the rails rather quickly.  From what I see you 
>might be able to manage it,  and that may be the ultimate route for you.
>
>Good luck.
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:06:25 -0600
>From: ZP <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [ubuntu-studio-users] 13.o4
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>On 09/04/2013 09:30 AM, Gord L Williams wrote:
>> Okay dudes, I have a perfect install of 13.o4 with everything working. 
>> Do you want me to try the upgrade, or just wipe it and install clean?
>> ?--?
>> ?Alex Armani - IT Consultant / Digital Musician?
>> +447972641526?- MYspace.com/Alex.Armani
>> ?www.newmatrixism.com
>>
>> Alex,  I use LTS versions only,  which are supported for a longer 
>> cycle.  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS   Although they lack the latest 
>> software,  as in bleeding edge,  they are stable as they get.  I would 
>> suggest 12.04 LTS if you want to rock out for a while. 13.04 and 
>> anything non LTS has a shorter support cycle, and usually when they 
>> fix it another version catches the attention of everyone and off they 
>> go,  to an extent.
>>
>> If your purpose is recording like mine is,  you can add the latest 
>> Ardour or Mixbus fairly easily to this stable base.   All other 
>> software is also subject to update,  as well.  In this way your 
>> wanting for little.  Sometimes a software requires the latest version 
>> of the libraries (linux programs rely on them and often aren't 
>> compiled in the same way windows programs are,  and can be a bit more 
>> painful,  Windows programs will update the libraries at install - .net 
>> is one of them for instance.)
>>
>> The point is there is a decision to be made in most cases between 
>> bleeding edge and stable.  I opt for stable obviously and upgrade only 
>> what I absolutely need.   The alternative is to look for distributions 
>> that have done it for you.  Ubuntustudio is one, KXStudio is another 
>> and Dreamstudio is probably the most augmented in terms of software. 
>> Dreamstudio comes with the latest Ardour, no need to install it.  But 
>> going the route of installing a distribution can be rather uneven in 
>> that respect.  Distributions pick the software,  and for instance I 
>> have no idea what to do with Cinelerra or if I will do something with 
>> it.  Maybe if I do some local stuff on video.  Mostly I am voiceover 
>> by remote.  Not my precise purpose, see what I mean?
>>
>> For digital music,  your probably fine with Ubuntustudio.  Me I am a 
>> voice over artist and tend to tear down or erase a lot of the synth 
>> stuff as it does not apply.   I do a little photography,  so I keep that.
>>
>> I suppose I just can't find an ideal distribution without what many 
>> call 'bloat'.   I tried at one point to go with a plain ubuntu 
>> distribution and customize it,  but that got off the rails rather 
>> quickly.  From what I see you might be able to manage it, and that may 
>> be the ultimate route for you.
>>
>> Good luck.
>>
>>
>Gord, I could be off the mark here...but I believe he was asking about 
>testing Studio 13.10, which was announced a little earlier in the list.
>
>|ZP|
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>-- 
>ubuntu-studio-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
>https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
>
>
>End of ubuntu-studio-users Digest, Vol 77, Issue 4
>**************************************************
>
>
>
-- 
ubuntu-studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Reply via email to