Jeroen Vermeulen wrote: > Milo Casagrande wrote: > >> Looking at the import queue of synaptic, there's only one pot file but it's >> in need review from June... So, I think this one _should_ be up to date. > > If it's in "need review," that means it's not been approved for import. > Which means it's a version of the template that hasn't been imported yet. > > Arne, any idea whether that template should be approved?
That template is synaptic-manual.pot, which does not appear in the package build log... The main synaptic.pot template is approved. Maybe the package maintainer or upstream can shed some light on whether the template should be imported or not? My opinion would be to not import it unless someone can proof that it is actually used in the binary package. Cheers Arne
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-translators mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
