Hi guys, У уто, 17. 03 2009. у 00:07 +0100, Alexey Balmashnov пише: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Adi Roiban <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 20:31 +0100, Alexey Balmashnov wrote: > >> Nice, looks like exactly the same errors as ones that had been fixed a > >> while back for Intrepid. > >> > >> Are there any chances that tool validating somehow results of > >> translators work will be merged into Rosetta? Or may be used as an > >> intermediate step somewhere in the import process for translations of > >> the current+1 release? > > > > Basicaly I was just converting back from po to xml and the from xml to > > html. > > > > I don't think we will have those validations in Rosetta, as Rosetta is > > supposed to work with PO files... and there is a long feature list > > waiting.
Which is not a blocker. See below. > Aha. Then one more point in the feature list won't make it longer > anymore, so why not to add this? This can best be done directly in GNU gettext (to allow "xml-format" format specifier) and xml2po and/or intltool. Once GNU gettext is able to check well-formed-ness of XML messages, I'd be happy to accept patches to both xml2po and/or intltool, and depending on the available time, I might even write them myself. And as soon as the upstream stack (GNU gettext, xml2po) supports such xml-format tag, Rosetta will support it as well. If I find time (read: unlikely), I'd be happy to extend GNU gettext to support "xml-format" as well, but if one wants to see that happen, they should not count on me. Basically, msgfmt -cv should be able to catch most of the problems like these. Cheers, Danilo -- ubuntu-translators mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
