El dl 28 de 09 de 2009 a les 19:03 +0300, en/na Adi Roiban va escriure: > Hi, > > Since all ubiquity-slideshow template were approved with priority 0 they > were listed on the last page. > > https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/ > > I have change the priority to 200 (same as debian-installer). >
Good work, Adi. Thanks for looking into that. > Also since the domain for each template is very generic (ex evolution, > fspot) , I have prepended "ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu-" to the name of > each template. > Otherwise we would have 2 templates named "evolution" (one for the real > evolution and the other one for ubiquity) and I can create confusions. > Yes, good idea. The ubiquity upstream project has also translations enabled, and I guess the template names should also be changed there to mirror the distro templates. > All templates are included in the language packs. Is there a reason to > include them the language packs? > I can't see any reason, I believe the language pack checkboxes can be unticked. > Do you think it is best to have a single template for all > ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu templates or it is best to leave them in > separate files? In my view it is much simpler to have them in a single > POT file. > I do agree, but I'm guessing that this has been done like this due to the build system of ubiquity? Evan, could you tell us more about this? Thanks. Regards, David. -- David Planella Ubuntu Translations Coordinator david(dot)planella(at)ubuntu(dot)com www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Això és una part d'un missatge signada digitalment
-- ubuntu-translators mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
