On 01/02/2014 03:52 PM, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > I quite liked it's simplicity but is it possible to move the "Quick > Search" feature to the top of the column (on the right) rather than > leaving it at the bottom? > > The contents lists are quite long so people probably don't instantly > realise the functionality exists. Also putting it at the top-right > would make it more consistent with other wiki's wouldn't it? (err, i > don't know now since i haven't checked for ages!) > > Anyway, good work so far! > Congrats and regards from > Tom :) > > > > On 2 January 2014 18:36, Mauricio Tavares <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Peter Matulis >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 12/13/2013 01:25 AM, William Van Hevelingen wrote: >>>> Yeah...looks like those didn't get converted. It shouldn't be that much >>>> effort to fix all the headers. The internal links will have to be fixed >>>> too, maybe a sed script can fix them up. >>>> >>>> I used sphinx to generate some html and posted it here: >>>> >>>> http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~wvan/serverguide/remote-administration.html >>>> >>>> Not really sure how to make the index/homepage work yet but this is a >>>> work in progress. :) >>>> >>>> Do you have any feedback so besides the other items you mentioned? >>>> >>>> Btw `make lintcheck` is awesome. It reports on all the broken external >>>> links and we can hook it up to continuous integration. >>> >>> Here is my own attempt, including some branding. Feedback welcome. >>> Yes, there are still broken links and the table of contents is too >>> expansive. I really like the streamlined markup (see 'Show Source' at >>> the bottom of the TOC). >>> >>> http://serverguide.papamike.ca:8081 >>> >> I think it looks nice; I do like simple clean interfaces so you >> can focus on content. How many header levels can you have with it? >> >> With that in mind, now I have some free time I personally want to >> figure out my ssh key issue and then populate some of the docs. For >> that, I do not care about whatever format we choose; just make sure we >> can convert from the current to the new style with as little pain as >> possible. >> >> In the mean time, I can work and flesh out my notes until I can start >> working on those docs. I would like to be able to sit down on the >> weekend and get stuff done. Ideally one topic per weekend.
After having spent a good part of the day going through just one file (chapter) I now know how much work is involved: 1. A good number of external links are broken 2. All internal links are broken and require a new way of linking (source and destination) 3. All admonitions (i.e. "notes" and "warnings") are crippled, but not outright broken 4. All working external links *should* be changed to a new format 5. Heading organization need to be redone in all chapters. All chapters have multiple 1st level headings. This is what was causing the flattened/expansize table of contents I mentioned earlier. 6. More theme/customization work 7. Research how this conversion will affect the translators and come up with a corrective plan I can't do all this myself; I estimate there is about 120 hours of work required. Anyone? pmatulis -- ubuntu-translators mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
