That doesn't sound good at all. The packages that have been published to -proposed have been copied from the langpack PPA, so I'd expect those to have sane contents (sanity tested by translators) - but maybe there's actually no one using those in reality. I'll look into this tomorrow. Thanks for the heads up!
Cheers, On 10 July 2018 at 23:01, Gunnar Hjalmarsson <[email protected]> wrote: > I started the test for Swedish, but found that something is very wrong. Many > .mo files, which ought to be present in the language-pack-gnome-sv package, > are absent, resulting in an untranslated desktop to a large extent. Please > see the attached file for a simple comparison between the package in > xenial-updates and the one in xenial-proposed. > > Can't tell if all languages are affected by this, but from a quick glance at > the French equivalent package, it looks like it's not only Swedish. > > Since the -base packages have not been updated, there must not be any > occurrences of "Only in language-pack-gnome-sv_16.04+20171210..." in the > diff, but there are quite a few of those. > > @Łukasz: Please check out what happened. > > To everybody else: It's probably best to wait with testing for now. > > > -- > Gunnar Hjalmarsson > https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj -- Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak Foundations Team [email protected] www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-translators mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
