Alan Be interested to hear on current views about positive / active interactions Ubuntu have with upstream projects currently following the Debion security hole, and the on going suggestion that distros should have their own patches against a branch of the kernal GIT repo. and not just hold them in house.
Additionally, what packagers look for in a project before bringing it into the official Ubuntu repos, and is the reverse true for projects that get dropped? Ian -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Philip Stubbs Sent: 15 May 2008 12:34 To: British Ubuntu Talk Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] UDS Questions for the podcast 2008/5/15 Alan Pope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If any of you have any burning questions you would like us to ask, > people you'd like us to talk to, or topics you'd like us to discuss - > either with the developers in general, or specific individuals, please > either comment on this thread or email us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Mark Shuttleworth recently hinted that he would like to see the major Linux Distributions synchronised. I am sure there are many and varied views on that. I would be interested to know what people think are the main benefits and drawbacks. Also, what are the hurdles that would need to be overcome to achieve it? -- Philip Stubbs -- [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.org/UKTeam/ -- [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.org/UKTeam/
