Philip Stubbs wrote: > 2009/11/3 Sean Miller <[email protected]>: >> Maybe it is time to ask the question again -- is the 6-month cycle too >> ambitious? >> >> Sean > > There will never be a 'one size fits all' If six months is too fast > for someone, then they should use only LTS releases. Alternatively, > they could use Debian, or Suse or RedHat etc.
Yes, I think you have a serious point there. I suppose the question may be the wisdom, in PR terms, of pitching the six-month releases, rather than the LTS releases, as "challengers" to Windows and Mac OSX. If you get a noticeable minority of people having issues with sixth-month releases (even acknowledging Al's point in another post that there is on balance a majority of successful experience) the PR consequences may be too great a risk. mac -- [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
