-- Sent from my Nokia N900 Please do not send me word documents plain txt or pdf are prefered.
----- Mensaje original ----- > On 26 September 2011 14:00, paul sutton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 26/09/11 13:48, Alan Pope wrote: > > > Now we're perilously close to releasing 11.10 onto the world, it's > > > been asked [0] what things the developers would like to see the focus > > > on for the 12.04 (Long Term Support) release. > > > > > > Personally I would like all core applications to support proxy > > > servers properly. Especially as it's an LTS release which is arguably > > > well-suited to corporate users who are those most often behind proxy > > > servers. (ubuntu one file sync being something that doesn't work > > > behind proxies) > > > > > > I wondered what you lot might desire for 12.04? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Al. > > > > > > [0] > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2011-September/012901 > > > > 1. Focus on stability rather than new features. > > > > 2. Good documentation > > > > 3. Posters and promo materials etc in the repositories so they can be > > downloaded easily as a package and accessed by users > > > > 4. If we don't have any perhaps some sort of content filtering system > > so we can allow people to filter unsuitable content (I know this will > > be controversial but if we don't it will work against us) > > > > 5. not suire if this is possible but linked to the above perhaps age > > ratingfs for games and again give users control so we can install games > > with more adult (usually blood, gore, violence) on a system but have > > the main (sudo account holder) choose which users can run the > > software, (so tight restrictions) have clear warnings about content on > > the software / games. If there are ratings then include these, doom > > for example was given a 15 rating, ok that was almost 15 years ago, > > but its still 15, if people choose to ignore that, then at least we > > cover our backs. > > > > I think this could be fairly easy to implement, the ratings can be > > included in software centre. > > > > 6. if we are not including synaptic make it easy to install this more > > 'advanced' stuff from software centre, > > > > > > Hope this helps if i think of anything else will reply to the above > > > > Paul > > > > > > -- > > [email protected] > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ > > > > +1 to all of Paul's suggestions :) > > -- > Regards, > Bill B. *[a.k.a. "SuprEngr"]* > > registered Linux user 523667 > registered Ubuntu user 32366 i agree with all but last suggestion. I would leave synaptic available in software centre. And not installed by default. And remove the advanced stuff from software centre.
-- [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
