Hi, I'll go and ask the 'duty SRU' person of the best way to proceed on this :)
Regards, Phill. On 3 December 2012 10:34, Barry Drake <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/12/12 21:42, Phill Whiteside wrote: > >> to have it back-ported it needs a couple of things... >> 1) A fix in current dev (which you have) >> 2) A bug in quantal raised (which may exist, but needs a bug number). >> 3) Follow the SRU reporting[1]. Especially the part about how to update >> the bug in readiness for the SRU team to follow it. If the 'I's are dotted >> and the 'T's crossed it will get in much faster. Remember, lots of bugs >> want to be SRU'd... only a finite number of SRU people... They will be able >> to act much faster if you've done that. >> > > The original bug report was: https://bugs.launchpad.net/** > ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+**bug/1040037<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1040037>and > was made from Quantal. That covers step 2 and step 3. I don't > understand how to go about step 3 as the bug ended up as an upstream bug in > the CUPS filters and not in LibreOffice. I imagine (am I right?) that as > the original bug report was in respect of Quantal, it will eventually get a > fix in that release. > > > Regards, Barry. > > -- > Barry Drake is a member of the the Ubuntu Advertising team. > http://www.ubuntu.com/ > > > -- > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/**UKTeam/ > > -- > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/>https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > >
-- [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
